|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
( ^2 b( R: X5 f' j/ ]. I) L( u# wAlthough both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at$ Q: t' u W* Z( `7 U/ E, E* ]
the exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the1 T" y4 j \- X7 b9 ]. Y6 u A
real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week
) ]: G n4 w, J& n2 @. Kstudy as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan. W/ h( R: f, |* y( ]' N
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36.
/ p- e6 q# D. c0 `6 C- ^! GDid you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I9 \ Z$ D9 G- m' W: @$ d% @
listed in chapter 3 and find something interesting?
# [1 f. q- |1 r& v! ` JIf you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other: B9 G& z+ P9 ` e, {& p8 H
planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at1 Y) J0 U3 g: e9 ^
conjunction (at the same degree) at:& ]9 ]: A; G3 C \
133/ \6 O1 C5 N1 h- z& L3 j
That's an interesting number because of its relationship to a
3 F+ C5 `6 Z8 s; G4 Qnumber in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its/ p. F9 r& v: S* H( D7 H" `. F
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another
( V* l) C) x0 [4 G- d1 M% ?1 ` and there is no need to go down that path now.% M, }6 i7 q- M) ~$ R! p; t% K9 g
It is also interesting because of its position on the Square of
9 p! h# A8 H7 j; I' ]# f! q7 Y. E% S+ |Nine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their
1 c% ~4 O* Y/ B# b* ]( L/ z3 Irelationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of7 }& }) q0 Z7 X" i) T! a7 i
resistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."# r# x: ?1 Z* K6 f# q
But that again is for another work and that path would take us
' v) J9 c1 p3 ?: W- z7 |down lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
0 C; V0 F( x- Genough to fill this book.
0 Y; e' L9 c3 u3 `: O) ZChaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess" |. }' D& A7 V% e
Just like in a single digit numbering system (another path we
- A+ R9 w" [# V/ Twill explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting
! Q$ ^- V( q9 w" Uover" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle
+ z& j3 s/ E$ Q9 ?( uwithout starting over.
3 k' a) ~' N4 E$ g5 ](We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")
5 l, \2 s/ W/ m4 e2 F fHe illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of4 @6 o/ ^+ p4 R- ~% m( ?0 B
0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.) @3 N1 G G5 V' a5 v# e
Actually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded. u6 t3 b, z1 K M% y4 W
off numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got
7 c# C' A8 E9 b. T76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my
; H H9 |# [# i% Mcalculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.
9 V7 X* G' u: @Instead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got
' v' ?' Q2 }1 K q( i2 S+ L360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in! m* n x3 W( f: _
this manner:+ r& _9 b* ]0 T9 G; e
436-76=360. N' c1 ^. s* g L4 z
360-76=284 |
|