|
|
原帖由 5575338 于 2008-7-31 17:48 发表 ![]()
9方图计算公式
在下面几个角度线上的：
0 degrees: (2n + 5/4)squared
45 degrees: (2n + 6/4)squared
90 degrees: (2n + 7/4)squared
135 degrees: (2n) squared
180 degrees: (2n + 1/4)squared
225 d ...
是这个吗?
Square of Nine Essentials
Daniel Ferrera, 2002
In my experience with working with this method, price &  must balance on a hard aspect.
The hard aspects are 45, 90, 135, 180, 225, 270, 315 and 360 or 0 degrees. The most
important being the squares or 90-deg harmonics (0, 90, 180, 270).
In terms of selecting a past date and price to start from, I have found that the lowest low over
the past 365-days and the highest high over the past 365-days have the greatest influence on
these balance points. This technique can be used to generate the horizontal support &
resistance levels for intraday trading. This is extremely useful when you anticipate that a
particular day will be a trend change as the result of cycles or counts, etc.
Carl Futia's formula for this reads
=MOD 360 ((price distance or Time change)^0.5*180-225)
This formula assumes that the Squares of Even numbers fall on the 135-deg angle and that the
Squares of Odd numbers fall on the 315-deg angle, which is not true on Gann's actual Square
of Nine chart.
If you start with a "1" in the center, the Squares of Odd numbers will fall on the 315-deg angle,
but the Even Squares (16, 36, 64, 100, 144....) will gradually float towards 135-degrees. For
example, on the actual Square of Nine
16 is on the 112.50-deg angle,
36 is on the 120-deg angle,
64 is on the 123.75-deg angle,
100 is on the 126-deg angle and
144 is on the 127.50-deg angle
and so on.
Starting with "0" in the center, the Squares of Even numbers will line up on the 135-deg angle
and the Squares of Odd numbers will Float.
Could this amount of inaccuracy or "Lost Motion" be important? After all, it is impossible to draw
or actually build a Square of Nine Chart based on the MOD 360 formula above. If you want to
work with calculations that are based on W.D. Gann's printed Square of Nine chart, the
following formulas will be of great use to your research:
Ring# = Round(((SQRT(Price)-0.22 / 2),0)
{This rounds to the nearest whole number, i.e. it eliminates the decimals}
Example: The number 390 is in Ring #10 if you crunch the above formula.
315-deg Angle: This is the most accurate angle of the entire chart and is used to calculate all
other values. The Squares of Odd numbers are all on this angle.
315-deg Angle = (Ring# * 2 +1)^2
Example: 390 was in ring# 10 so the 315-deg number is (10 * 2+1) ^2 or simply (21)^2 = 441
The Zero Angle on this Ring = ((Ring# * 2 + 1)^2) - (7* ring#). So you would get 441 - 70 =
371 This number is needed to calculate the angle that the 1st value of 390 is on.
Angle = Sum ((Price- Zero Angle) / (Ring/45)). So we have ((390 - 371) / (10/45) = 85.50-deg
You may have to occasionally adjust the Angle calculation because sometimes you will get a
negative value when you have a number that is approaching the 0-deg angle of the next ring.
For example: We know that 371 is a zero-deg number. If you try to find the angle of the number
370.5, which is a number in the previous ring approaching the next ring, you get Sum ((370.5 -
371) / (10/45)) = -2.25-deg. If you get a negative number, just add 360 to correct it. So this
would actually be 357.75-deg.
A simple formula to correct this is If Angle<0 then +360 else Angle = Angle.
To generate other values on the Square, use this formula: (Ring# * 2+1)^2) - (7* Ring#) +
((Ring# / 45) * Angle)
Angle is this formual is your input value. For example, we know that 390 is on the 85.50-deg
angle. If we want to know the value of the number that is 45-deg to this number, we would be
interested in the angle of 130.50-deg (85.5 + 45). Inputing this in the above formula gives us:
(10 * 2+1)^2 - (7 * 10) + ((10 / 45) * 130.5). Simplified a little, we have 371 + (28.99971) =
399.99 is 45-deg to 390.
Keep in mind that if you add or subtract an amount that will change the original angle (85.5-deg)
to an amount greater than 360 or less than 0, that you JUMP rings. For example, if you subtract
90-deg from 85.5 to potentially find a square aspect, you get -4.5-deg. Add 360 gives 355.50-
deg in the previous ring. We were using Ring# 10 in the formula, but for this calculation, we
would have to use Ring# 9. Similarly, if you added 315-deg to 85.5-deg, you get 400.50, which
is 40.5-deg in the next ring. So you would have to use ring# 11 for this calculation |
|
|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|【阳光飞狐】
( 网站ICP编号：京ICP备06013475号-7 )
发表于 2008-7-31 17:48:41
收藏
分享
发表于 2008-7-31 18:01:27
楼主
发表于 2008-7-31 19:22:03
