|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
' o7 n: ?+ K& x/ a, H* a$ \- PAlthough both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at
$ D: X# z* Q! ~. ?# V3 bthe exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the
* n6 Y- P9 Z- T q0 L" V8 ?real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week$ v' k9 ]; L* a! w3 @* L
study as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.
! S0 l) _4 x9 Y1 o. Y15, 1948 when the high was $4.36.
* Y# Y2 z7 B; T/ U: WDid you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I
( o0 k8 D" w% W* X- Ilisted in chapter 3 and find something interesting?
8 C# q1 |, J) N, pIf you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other
% v3 u1 F T7 c* Q, s8 Kplanets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at
( V2 y0 B9 K) A. F, Xconjunction (at the same degree) at:. w3 G9 k* Y' I: W! B6 A- Q! V# i
133! V& x8 P5 a" h
That's an interesting number because of its relationship to a
1 M P: Z4 C7 S$ m$ anumber in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its# B- d5 I* u2 v q3 Y8 U+ k% s% m2 T
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another
, [, n. b' D/ J. a and there is no need to go down that path now.% {0 | S) p/ x7 W
It is also interesting because of its position on the Square of3 Z+ }: d' m8 W: F& S+ c1 x
Nine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their
X; B- M, ?2 U, ]5 e5 \) @relationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of) V/ M, Q, O. l# Q2 \* @/ y6 F
resistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."" Q' l* p/ l2 P
But that again is for another work and that path would take us: R( k; |' M. @/ a9 L6 D8 u
down lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
0 b8 m" s% M. a0 c" a V& q+ S' yenough to fill this book.
9 F8 L/ P- o/ s H2 sChaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess
' {: S" k) n) q( p9 ?Just like in a single digit numbering system (another path we
, g5 J, ~3 N/ B4 lwill explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting
" c5 C% s' @. K/ F; b2 eover" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle9 ^$ R* a. B( T1 ^: Q. A
without starting over.
0 V8 w' q9 {3 x2 V(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")
9 U; E3 H- z' \He illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of
4 L; j# V3 ] d* s8 \) L9 w8 w0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.
4 ]! m9 c7 n+ o) BActually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded
1 \% {& x( o( woff numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got
: ~4 \& M) ^( r76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my h; a1 F' ]8 ]$ C" y) F0 F1 O
calculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.% `' K$ b. P z$ K U) }& J0 w
Instead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got
a( i% Q+ q9 ~. _360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in
1 O- C7 S! j2 J4 |$ k9 K6 @4 Xthis manner:
: I4 { M7 |" w436-76=360
. ^% x l! I! {( c h1 [360-76=284 |
|