|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
5 Q( X7 }. w8 k' Y7 P* ?; }Although both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at' m, \2 B' L9 k1 |1 c- b. l
the exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the% {* o/ b! @; f. C' ]5 F
real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week
6 f/ B9 O$ y' x+ }study as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.: h/ I, D4 u- R% m
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36." s0 `% x& {5 n, ?! U# O
Did you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I
h2 S( @$ M- K. Hlisted in chapter 3 and find something interesting?- e6 k% d& n: ?
If you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other
! M+ j: m. P- b; R; u4 H" \planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at
: ^8 M: W7 S; r$ l" y1 Xconjunction (at the same degree) at:
* {6 b7 Q( G) `133
. n( A2 A7 D( y0 ^! X: |That's an interesting number because of its relationship to a
/ `. d: B4 j2 ^/ Z) t1 nnumber in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its, m) }0 H# T0 q6 P
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another* D% V( V( R, n" j* H! @
and there is no need to go down that path now.+ {7 K- \5 u2 H$ I# G
It is also interesting because of its position on the Square of) y+ g( g/ M: ^: A
Nine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their
4 \6 P/ i+ k; B7 P$ c/ crelationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of
, r( y5 C; a% D" { Dresistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."
" `" D2 E* o ]- FBut that again is for another work and that path would take us
7 F+ } F# Y+ t9 r$ m/ T5 e+ B9 f- pdown lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
4 B r4 P' ` [ a- F: o# u6 z5 Xenough to fill this book.( u7 \; P' [/ l6 E2 e4 o
Chaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess: E) h+ }- P5 w: D1 S4 `. n) b
Just like in a single digit numbering system (another path we& U% E, n# W7 r$ r" m
will explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting
) M* A+ h9 q9 d8 jover" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle
' u; \5 T" Q5 Y! B4 Pwithout starting over." N9 t' t' w+ f" U' ]1 f% _, Q
(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")+ Y1 c8 `, R: S, t( u( u1 p
He illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of
& w7 E$ }+ q3 Y( n' ?( Z0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.7 V e" ?" V- f$ }; X
Actually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded' |% s( r2 G9 I/ |( w
off numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got8 P" ~7 q" z0 C: s9 u
76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my
+ l4 F3 U {: _. J9 o4 r9 D3 C- s0 qcalculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann." |7 ]' l7 T' |$ P D$ v
Instead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got, m* L* ?. ]$ e) b
360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in: W- Q0 c) y' z" G* J b' A
this manner:1 {+ u# Y- q) [9 c! ]3 w
436-76=360: s# I* r7 f* c" _$ x; `
360-76=284 |
|