|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
# |* L M5 J6 c# ?5 m$ wAlthough both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at# ~: u) j8 W, D2 b0 m% K) K" L: y
the exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the$ I) v( n% }" I/ O6 |! M
real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week+ b7 O& P) W: Y) H' a
study as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.- J& x* K) ]" X# i) G
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36.
, w. a$ c2 {9 Q' P+ h" DDid you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I; Q+ d0 n( k% l# v. T+ j
listed in chapter 3 and find something interesting?
6 W7 I7 f: N8 ^4 ?2 YIf you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other3 K) n3 m" w3 G, D5 K
planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at
! [7 k2 ~( z7 Vconjunction (at the same degree) at:7 ~5 m" a+ n( J5 n' Q
133
1 r0 d5 j1 B r7 ^, ~That's an interesting number because of its relationship to a1 t( L9 V6 q ?6 q% g" M( ^
number in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its, B% Q7 Y) `2 j$ i) R
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another- T. R7 k3 v; Q, D3 i) n4 R
and there is no need to go down that path now.
' v2 W. d2 M% u8 c2 `, D1 T% c/ j; kIt is also interesting because of its position on the Square of
- k2 x. z* y) CNine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their
0 j; ^9 O) G& ~/ R# u7 f6 R8 R* trelationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of1 `' R( b9 }8 N X2 F
resistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."4 N8 }: e8 t' A f# x) k
But that again is for another work and that path would take us& u* ^1 z: d$ H/ N. M
down lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
2 F- e1 v, ~3 m: Denough to fill this book.
- I* k8 ^; n% XChaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess
3 u! i1 C3 h1 w4 ~& [5 p: E% KJust like in a single digit numbering system (another path we" Y6 c0 L( X9 u3 B: `% p
will explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting4 B7 b) E! t$ }6 V
over" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle* U8 Y/ h8 E' L4 j, j
without starting over.
: ?3 f5 u9 k9 E( D& E7 Z(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.") K: b5 m/ V+ z* q
He illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of1 P+ p% p' I8 ?+ v1 [% M9 w5 s
0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.
* p: K* ^9 n3 }' o& a% s' @9 YActually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded; i! ]$ W6 ?2 W% g4 k- }- u- m
off numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got
! A5 e7 W5 q: J3 X76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my7 O9 q& _2 w, g8 \( {
calculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.
/ {' D1 a8 j4 C) YInstead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got6 H( Q' ` B9 q# A
360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in# `, |3 C* o; G6 ]
this manner:4 ], O# z/ y" U% q" I
436-76=360
0 c6 t5 m- z. F% J360-76=284 |
|