|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
$ h1 ]2 V8 ^# SAlthough both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at8 @& |0 v% A5 w6 a. p- I9 U" L
the exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the
8 L, a5 I- c" G6 U. z$ o( ]! D2 ]6 Q2 [real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week
( [' F& L9 m7 E, I6 W" v0 vstudy as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.( ^# O: F1 Y9 r9 l6 F& \
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36.
& t- n, _5 ^% i4 O+ s( E: P& IDid you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I
& m# P5 q2 J& g d9 X$ L. l9 m; Ulisted in chapter 3 and find something interesting?1 _7 P X# ?3 d3 o
If you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other( b0 R0 [) h' c
planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at1 s' E) g! K/ S8 d* f) z
conjunction (at the same degree) at:' g) x- P6 S1 B S5 E4 f; k0 P% m
1339 Q1 O1 K# o: h7 d2 v/ M& n# Y
That's an interesting number because of its relationship to a
1 E. S* c* X' b! R& Enumber in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its
3 c; P+ Z! Q* E7 v, orelationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another& \0 D- h4 ]4 S' H6 Z4 T
and there is no need to go down that path now.: Z3 t9 @1 ]0 {+ _) S: G
It is also interesting because of its position on the Square of( W0 i$ z8 g1 H- N, l8 s
Nine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their8 a4 o8 a w+ v3 P2 v
relationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of
N! M+ ?; O3 Dresistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."
) `0 A5 p: o% w' l* aBut that again is for another work and that path would take us
) ^4 a- [1 l& a& g" v' t% h+ ddown lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is+ b0 P9 g! @7 W6 [# E
enough to fill this book.9 ?8 Y' {6 \6 |: j- g
Chaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess
# E( P; ^. K J! {3 \6 e) W3 wJust like in a single digit numbering system (another path we
6 p5 I: ?3 }8 \" F6 N. k( y* \will explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting3 J/ m/ c% r9 I; N- }% `
over" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle
O+ V" y- g+ I, kwithout starting over.. m6 p, Z4 X& K
(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")' F4 ?& O9 t, ~
He illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of
& x3 E9 P2 k9 u# y( C' y( R) o0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.& K) x2 a. @4 \$ c2 }# I! z. K
Actually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded
) v3 m3 m1 \$ |5 E2 b2 Y- _& n' O- doff numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got
$ \/ @1 q) F( L4 V76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my
; @( u d2 P! d7 n. U2 }; x7 Acalculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.0 Z% R1 R! W* b' p3 }
Instead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got q( x: a$ z! H! j6 Y) O" w9 L
360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in8 I9 r9 H5 D, b2 E7 ~4 p$ b$ j
this manner:
& F" F; [) K; i3 v/ [, e- m436-76=360
" T( S C( }$ d( Y360-76=284 |
|