|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh* c4 n0 e+ R& _$ m' C$ \, n
Although both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at
. a; n/ {0 d* tthe exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the2 \- k9 e7 e1 A+ b
real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week9 ]* b) M. @( E& E
study as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.4 ^* @. i4 T$ K2 v3 j8 O4 [' Q, c
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36., f/ Z- ~9 f% f5 G2 D
Did you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I
- K8 h4 \; u1 _' e, p$ Flisted in chapter 3 and find something interesting?
, ]! F2 r: q$ s1 \If you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other0 o: A+ K. {2 o. J( ?
planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at
( ]3 i D, T3 F4 d8 ^2 D' fconjunction (at the same degree) at:
* |1 h$ R8 p+ M5 N! ^133
% b* Z. g8 x/ U$ DThat's an interesting number because of its relationship to a/ _$ w1 C' S" k
number in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its" C& l5 H2 F. ]7 S+ J# H
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another
$ W- v! B) o6 k! x and there is no need to go down that path now.
' u$ a q( v/ c2 b8 c6 I: z7 ?4 KIt is also interesting because of its position on the Square of/ |, M4 [: F. j' Y
Nine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their: f) h7 N+ _" l; _- q- ~
relationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of+ f8 {+ `! g9 r( a# f# f6 D: N
resistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."
; D; B7 L* [* I5 ?8 D9 _% iBut that again is for another work and that path would take us: j/ Z% }) O$ S
down lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
1 }$ O* i: C: c, E3 benough to fill this book.: Z: ^& r$ S2 i' l$ t0 U3 o `, b3 U
Chaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess0 x2 t% V- ?$ `7 ^2 E: a4 i: V+ k2 |
Just like in a single digit numbering system (another path we% v5 V8 q( I- |5 N) z6 K- |5 y9 ]
will explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting
) F) ~/ D& L, r* \0 Dover" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle
; X* E5 F1 ^- G- cwithout starting over.- e/ }" Z) i- D
(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")
* J. ?; Z6 ]/ f0 X4 K. q' `He illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of
0 z9 x1 B5 o3 ?0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.8 v" f3 d' Z* ?# l& t* `" ^$ u( w
Actually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded% Y; L' h7 G: w {+ H# Z" k2 f- |
off numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got
* f* |1 w3 Y% b; q; {76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my! o8 ^2 @6 J' K: b( [' e
calculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.
; o$ k/ N0 }( zInstead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got
1 V w# _& |% _) j, d/ z- X360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in0 o J) W7 ~( S, W2 f- b% ~2 o3 k
this manner:
, o! O/ D( ^' [) C7 f6 i2 `436-76=360
0 M* I6 R' @/ w! ~: s7 A360-76=284 |
|