|
|
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
/ _/ n0 }! D' W$ I( i! G# vAlthough both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at
2 j1 u6 _- u f, lthe exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the4 [: N6 o3 ]: |/ y$ u3 h) c" t! Z
real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week
/ R. Z$ ], s: Istudy as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.5 i( z. I) m: v* O+ l8 z" V5 y% H
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36.
) }) Q# Y, l# l; x6 @- aDid you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I5 S' k! ]$ d5 p- l; X4 `& T; v
listed in chapter 3 and find something interesting?
& b' ^3 r! _: N; oIf you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other
9 }& Z) e: P5 m: _& _; }planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at* z* i' H4 W& l( [
conjunction (at the same degree) at:5 p' O- B3 G6 B$ m
133
) X4 ^5 H+ ?1 `) y; ?" LThat's an interesting number because of its relationship to a, [( \1 @8 G6 i
number in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its' |( \1 T- e, g' S! ~3 F. _. F
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another
g/ H# c) i2 H" c( G$ D+ W and there is no need to go down that path now.
" _& J- t+ V1 BIt is also interesting because of its position on the Square of
" t( N3 {/ g' [ W- S; X2 L% WNine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their
9 n9 x, K: l- ~6 brelationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of
$ m7 B/ x4 U6 x2 W$ d/ C& iresistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."5 t+ w# S# J& I& v$ }" K- b
But that again is for another work and that path would take us
* _6 |0 b( t9 X1 L( vdown lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
$ x" ~5 U2 W T# \1 h3 ?enough to fill this book.2 m7 d7 B% t6 H2 i9 a) I* P7 Y
Chaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess
9 n7 B$ i- z: U5 X% m+ VJust like in a single digit numbering system (another path we* k8 X7 P% X* A1 T# j* r" k
will explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting
; I8 @; l: I" C1 `. Dover" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle& K/ L( D# q. o/ ^ y& S# a
without starting over.; o& o4 F5 _3 h" i! B
(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")
, g9 @& Y4 k. _2 x5 RHe illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of
$ j0 Y/ _& k8 d0 ~; @5 z5 {2 F/ I0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course." F0 K2 E7 d9 ^* U
Actually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded; @, J- m; }- g- w5 N9 K
off numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got! z( v) A! z+ K( j/ A+ M3 v
76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my
4 O) N) x2 Y( [! I+ g4 Y9 }. Ucalculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.$ U+ \0 ]9 ^ ^) I) m
Instead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got8 R) o( e& A* @$ Y
360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in
- h& H) ~; i Z7 Y7 Bthis manner:
) ]+ h) _! I- C436-76=360) o; D! v; ?( V1 G' M
360-76=284 |
|