我现在才知道。晕死。
考虑下这对金融星相学的影响。
大家都发表下看法。作者: yay 时间: 2008-7-17 15:22
很难预料!
我看守住最原始的最好!作者: 我来啦耶 时间: 2008-7-17 16:23
自然法则不接受人类的规定。作者: transit2563 时间: 2008-7-17 16:28
雖然冥王星被科學家所惕除
但此星對占星學家來說也是非常重要的一顆星
它代表著 性 死亡 意志力與神秘...等
在金融占星學上,冥王星代表礦脈,資源回收,環保,商業財團
所以我覺得不必理會科學家他們的看法作者: 沙沫 时间: 2008-7-17 16:39
我的考虑在于，江恩似乎也没有使用冥王星，因为在他的星相学成型时冥王星还没有被发现。
另外，好象也有其它介绍GANN的星相的书提到GANN不使用冥王星。当然，我手上没有GANN的星相除期货教程外更多的资料也不敢说什么。
另外，我的出发点是星相，而非占星。主要是我不懂占星的东西。从其中我考虑的是时间循环的周期问题，最主要的是周期的不等长的性质。作者: 跳跳雨 时间: 2008-7-17 16:58
现代天文学与传统星象学是完全不同的思想体系。作者: transit2563 时间: 2008-7-17 17:54
請問星象與占星有何不同?
雖然冥王星在金融占星上較少運用
但在時事占星學上確是主要判斷
如:1990年8/3日,伊拉克入侵科威特
當天就是火星辰宮14度沖冥王星卯宮14度,你說這會不會影響國際股市
據我多年的觀察,冥王星與其他行星所形成的相位的確會影響股市漲跌
雖然江恩當時沒有運用冥王星,方式有點不同,但預測結果是一樣的,不就是要知道明天漲或跌?
主題是冥王星,如果你認為不重要,我也不便說什麼作者: transit2563 时间: 2008-7-17 18:31
Chaptter 4--Lookiing att tthe Hiigh
Although both of these crossings of Jupiter by Mars occurred at
the exact price of beans, neither one of these crossings was at the
real high of this period. Remember we started this 267-week
study as presented in Gann's discussion of the Square of 144 on Jan.
15, 1948 when the high was $4.36.
Did you look at the planetary positions on Jan. 15, 1948 that I
listed in chapter 3 and find something interesting?
If you did not, try comparing the number of Mars with the other
planets. Now what did you find? Correct. You found Mars and Pluto at
conjunction (at the same degree) at:
133
That's an interesting number because of its relationship to a
number in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Gann's novel, and its
relationship to the Great Cycle. But that's another work for another and there is no need to go down that path now.
It is also interesting because of its position on the Square of
Nine chart in relationship to a triangle of the Teleois and their
relationship to a paragraph in Gann's planetary discussion of
resistance lines on soybeans in his "private papers."
But that again is for another work and that path would take us
down lots of roads with many forks and the work we have at hand is
enough to fill this book.
Chaptter 5--Subttracttiing 360 Degreess
Just like in a single digit numbering system (another path we
will explore later) where "you cannot go beyond 9 without starting
over" Gann noted that you cannot go more than 360 degrees in a circle
without starting over.
(We will discover why later in our study of "Natural Squares.")
He illustrates this in his discussion of the price and time chart of
0 to 360 degrees on page 153 of the course.
Actually the high on beans was $4.36 3/4, but Gann often rounded
off numbers for convenience sake. So, subtracting 360 from 436 I got
76. As I said in the preface, I ran thousands of numbers through my
calculator looking for PATTERNS. Here, I went one better than Gann.
Instead of subtracting 360 from 436, I subtracted 76 from 436 and got
360 and kept subtracting 76 until I could not subtract any more in
this manner:
436-76=360
360-76=284作者: 烟花久久 时间: 2008-7-25 16:03
无法接受没有冥王星的太阳系
period. Remember we started this 267-week